VT’s Tech Blog

Here’s another article from our Guest Blogger Dr. Abhishek Puri on Opera. You can read his previous article here.

---

Shifting to Linux is fraught with taking a decision in the unknown many a times. This was my feeling when I first pestered with a barrage of questions on the forums as a “n00b”.

We are so much used to the proprietary systems that it seems the “open source alternatives” may not be able to “stand up to them”. For example, the open source alternative to MS office is Open Office (including a suite of other programmes but then it is all about choice). For an average user, the predefined set task flows are good enough. Yet, there is an inherent resistance to change because the open source options don’t always feel “like” the way “standard” option does.

Hence it makes sense to stick on to products with options for cross platform approach. I have been using Opera as my standard desktop browser, which may sound antithesis to my said approach towards Open Source as a whole. The very fact that Opera has a commitment towards “Open Standards” and to “free up the web” from the evil eye of “Explorer” is a motivation enough to stick on to this browser.

Opera has had a solid reputation for innovation. They came up with tabbed browsing way before anyone even thought of that. Firefox as a “spin off” from the doomed Mozilla product is in many ways an “open source clone” of Opera. It has sought to “generate” a whole ecosystem of “extensions” with a very buggy approach towards it’s browser as a whole. The software is stunted in it’s approach and the Mozilla Foundation has neither a coherent acclaimed goal nor depth of thought process to implement it’s flagship product.

Opera has followed consistent path to dominate the browser market through mobiles and game consoles but has raised serious issues of privacy concerns. In any case, the vast majority of us nevertheless have been relying on so called “cloud computing” with no iota of debate about the same. Privacy can never be guaranteed on the Internet with variety of methodologies to hunt your browsing habits. Barring this, the product is sheer joy to use because of it’s intuitive interface and the fact that it works across the platforms. Which means that user choices are similar across the platforms and it is just a matter of synchronizing with Opera’s servers.

This isn’t about Firefox bashing but it’s competitors have a pathetic approach which makes Opera “stand out” in comparison. Coming back to where I started from. Opera has it’s native feel in Unix, BSD or even Solaris and across the “dominant platform”, Microsoft Windows.

Two notable events are worth mentioning. One is that Opera’s implementation of Widgets which can run on any platform independent of the browser; almost like an “extension library” as for other browsers like Firefox and Chrome. The other is implementation of user sharing experience of Unite. This is brilliant because it allows for a simple file transfer protocol to be implemented from the browser; while not in the strictest sense of the term but nevertheless, makes file sharing across the various connected systems a breeze.
Firefox has a lot of catching up to do; it uses up a lot of memory footprint, eats up bandwidth and is bug prone. Neither it has a mobile version but it remains a pathetic implementation of Open Source. Worse still, it cannot even package for Unix systems; instead relies on old “tar” archival format.

Should closed source systems be allowed to be ported on open source systems? This is indeed a matter of debate but then again it all boils down to personal perspective and user choice. The whys and hows are best left to be answered according to one’s approach to the solution.

I did have an issue with Opera’s 10.10 default installation in Ubuntu. It used to randomly freeze my “X” screen. This was a documented bug mentioned on the forums but there was no quick work around. Opera is implementing the new version of it’s Carakan based browser very soon and has significant amount of resources devoted to the same. They must beat the Mach deadline before MS starts shipping with it’s service packs and allows for a browser choice. For obvious reasons, Opera wants to have a stable release of it’s justified claims of the “fastest browser”.

Any alternative to Opera like Chrome is less than perfect solution. I have had to add extensions downloaded from Chrome website to make it functional as I was used on Opera. It’s ad blocking and handling of RSS feeds sucks majorly and I truly miss the in built mail client and RSS reader with occasional IRC chats as all in one solution.

The newer beta for Windows is truly a revelation. I still have to get used to something better than this. The page loads up in a jiffy and handling of resource intensive web sites is simply amazing. Opera’s engineers have worked truly hard to make an astounding product and justify the tag of the world’s fastest browser.

It would take some time before Opera 10.5 is available for other platforms; nevertheless, the wait is truly justified.

The debate between closed and open source can never have a clear winner. But everything is finally dependent on the freedom of choice and it is imperative that we become aware of such a choice too.